White Man March

Posted on by
Reply

We’ll keep bashing the dead White males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.” – Noel Ignatiev, editor of the anti-white Race Traitor magazine.

By Jack Dempsey -This article is addressed to nationalists. You have a duty: you need to be protesting against the genocide of the White race on March the 15th of this year.

Why?

On this day, due to the vision of an American nationalist called Kyle Hunt, we aim to get nationalists all across the world onto the streets to make a statement: we will not allow our people to be subject to the genocide imposed on them by the current regimes of the west.

This is called The White Man March (link, here).

But is this crazy? After all, where is the evidence of genocide against the White race?

In Britain, this can be answered through the research of Professor David Coleman of Oxford University.

According to Dr. Coleman, White people will become a minority in this country by 2066; and we are, of course, already a minority in London.

Do the maths. If non-White numbers are going up and White numbers are going down then that means we will be dispossessed of our land, blended into the non-White masses and vulnerable to non-White alliances aimed against us.

We are dying; check the definition of genocide by the United Nations!

Government policies have lead to this warped reality unfolding, and the reasons why they have done this can make you one of only two things: a conspiracy theorist or a coincidence theorist.

I will be honest: if you believe, despite a plethora of evidence, that we aren’t living under an anti-White regime intent on our people’s genocide then stop reading this article, buy yourself some beers, and watch the anti-White TV.

Why the Mantra IS Important

Africa for Africa

Asia for Asia

White countries for EVERYBODY

White Countries and ONLY White countries have had conditions imposed on them where we can NOT sustain our long-term survival.

Diversity is a codeword for White genocide.

Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.

In essence, this is what The White Man March is all about: spreading the mantra into the mainstream of our race.

Invented by Bob Whitaker, the mantra can be used in many different ways, but, for us, it has three main purposes:

(1) Defeating anti-Whites (people who support White genocide) when they engage in leftist shaming language

(2) Giving our movement a consistent message

(3) Warning our people about the true intentions of our current treacherous ruling classes.

Defeating Anti-Whites When they Use Leftist Shaming Language

Let’s face facts: anti-Whites haven’t got any legitimacy. White countries and Only White countries have been subjected to conditions where we can’t ensure our long-term survival. This is genocide under UN Law, but anti-Whites – a mixture of self-hating White creeps and White-hating non-White monsters – have something that they use as a weapon of war: leftist shaming language.

Anti-Whites are a despicable breed of people, and they tend to lack the prerequisites needed to enter into reasonable debate with pro-Whites (people against White genocide) due to their anti-White hatred and low intelligence; they have, however, an anti-White media on their side and a word created by a pervert Marxist fanatic called Magnus Hirschfield: RACIST!

The mantra language developed by Bon Whitaker and his Swarm defeats anti-White hate terms such as racist, bigot, and White supremacist through simple statements of reality: those creatures who use leftist shaming language against White people who seek to preserve their culture, race and nation are bombarded with pro-White counters that show these people for what they are: anti-Whites.

Here are the basics: you say anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White in response to the ‘’R’’ word. You can learn the rest at the White Genocide Project website; this website provides the tools needed to put anti-Whites in their place; we need to enter these tools into mainstream White discourse.

Giving Our Movement a Consistent Message

Like all movements, we need an end goal. But what is it? Unfortunately, this has been one of the main problems that our movement has faced since the globalist-elites and their lackeys opened up the borders to White countries and ONLY White countries after World War 2.

Many people have worked hard to help the White race, and much of this has helped us understand the context of our struggle; but preaching to the converted about White historical achievements, the interlocking paedophile networks that holds the anti-White establishment together, differences in racial genotypes, and many other things have never generated the critical mass needed to get our movement going.

The reason for this is simple: we have bombarded the masses of our people with the tragic details of our anti-White System and we haven’t given them the big picture – we are being targeted for extinction.

All movements, all throughout history, have had a definite intention, so we should be the same. The English Parliamentarians wanted more powers handed to representative institutions; we seek to prevent White genocide. The Jacobins wanted the people of France to be unified under the banner of freedom, equality and brotherhood; we seek to prevent White genocide.

You get the picture, right?

Warning our People about the True Intentions of Our Current Treacherous Elites

Let’s be very clear: we are moving towards a New World Order. This isn’t a joke and we must use the limited freedoms we now possess while we still have a chance. The globalist-elites who control this world are sick people; and they are targeting the White race because they think (no offence to non-Whites) we are their biggest competitors.

I ask you a question: what do you think things such as the European Union, Agenda 21, the Frankfurt School and the ubiquitous wars for international banksters were created for?

Why did Richard Coudenhove Kalergi, the patriarch of the European Union, say that the European of the future would be a hybrid race ruled over by a totalitarian ‘’spiritual elite’’? – Open your eyes, the biggest honour spewed out by the European Union is the Richard Coudenhove Kalergi Prize and it is handed out every two years to the biggest traitor amongst the EU politicians.

These people are not our friends.

As well as being under constant surveillance, we are living under a government that starved 500,000 children to death in Iraq.

If you think these animals aren’t capable of doing the things they have been threatening about you are brainwashed.

If you think our government gives a damn about the average person on the street you need a brain transplant. We need to use the truth of White genocide as a way of warning our people: you have a duty.

What We Can Do From Here.

“All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as self-evident.”

― Arthur Schopenhaher

We must remember that we are nothing like the demented reprobates who currently rule over us. We aren’t monsters who are capable of staging terror attacks, invading sovereign nations, poisoning our own people with GMO foods, flooding White nations and ONLY White nations to kill them off, programming these non-White immigrants to hate the native people, dumbing down a whole generation of children, and many other sick things done by the sick people who currently rule over us.

All we seek is freedom, so we must, before it is too late, network as much as possible and make sure we are out on the streets on March the 15th.

Spread the word: if you are fluent in a foreign language find a way of telling nationalists in that country about the White Man March, if you are a non-English White living in this country go out with the people in your community or even with English patriots to show solidarity to our common cause – think, use your imagination, do something, don’t let them win.

Make sure you spread your protests all across the Internet.

We are spreading memes, so there is no way the anti-White regime can stop it from spreading by attacking us as individuals. You can kill a person, but you can’t kill an idea.

Make sure your protests are peaceful, legal and professional and the people will see that we aren’t the monsters that the real monsters say we are; and remember: once the anti-White regimes start having to explain why they are committing genocide against our people, their evil little scam is as good as finished.

THE EVOLUTION OF WHITE GENOCIDE

Posted on by
Reply

The Evolution of White Genocide

Anti-Zionist League
January 19, 2014

Until the close of WWII the ethnic European had never envisaged the concept of the total destruction of a people.

Sure inter-tribal and inter-racial war was a feature of Europe historically, but the physical intention to wipe out a specific racial type was never a part of the European mind set. In this light the word of Greek origin ‘holocaust’ meaning to consume by fire or burnt offering is of ritual consequence referring to an individual sacrifice.

Nevertheless in 1948 the Jewish controlled United Nations convened a Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG). It insists that instances of ‘genocide’ have taken place
It was the Jew Raphael Lemkin who invented the term “genocide” in 1944 by combining Greekgenos (γένος; race, people) and Latin cīdere (to kill) the essence of which suggest the destruction of a specific gene type. However, Lemkin defined genocide as follows:

“Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”

In this he codifies a very specific notion of genocide pertaining particularly to ‘nation’. In 1944 it was still understood that ‘nation’ meant people not territory thus the 1953 edition of the shorter Oxford Dictionary was still defining genocide as the destruction of a race.

Yet the very specificity of Lemkin’s definition indicates an intention for a theoretical assault on the concept of genocide. Almost 70 years of Jewish Marxist propaganda has corrupted the concept of Nation relating it to country rather than racial heritage. With this Marxist ‘politically correct’ version of Nation flooding the language later dictionary definitions of genocide have naturally been sanitised falling in line with Lemkin’s rather broad description. The idea was to initiate the concept of targeted annihilation but render the general word so bland that its parallel would be imbued with enormous sympathetic significance. This would explain the tidal wave of propaganda that hit in the late 60′s. It was at this point that as Holodomor Info states “Jewish Hollywood was tripping over itself to clutter the market with ‘Holocaust’ movies, dramas and documentaries.”

The Jewish tribe engendered the word ‘Holocaust’ with a new meaning. In the Jewish construct the target for annihilation was to be very specific the use of the word ‘Holocaust’ was to be reserved for the Jewish tribe only. The significance of this is threefold. First in order to activate the ‘Holocaust’ construct it was necessary to introduce the ethnic European to an alien concept that of ‘genocide’ or the conscious destruction of a people. Initially the nature of this destruction or ‘Genocide’ implies that all people are equally worthy of life the conscious massacre of which being immoral. Therefore, the second issue is to give the word ‘genocide’ less impact by blaring its meaning. However, a counterpart of Genocide also meaning annihilation identifies a very specific people. Consequently the third and final task is to promote this construct as ‘unique’ so there is no doubt of the Jewish hallowed status.

This sort of contempt for the ethnic European is rife throughout the Jewish community. The origin can be found in the Talmud, the Jewish book of law-Jehovah created man in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The European is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night. Midrash Talpioth p. 225-L Subsequent Rabbis, particularly in the occupied territory of Palestine, advocate these views and most notably in New York the infamous Rabbi Ginsburgh expounded the view that non-Jews may be killed in order to supply the Jew with organs. With this a group of Jewish Israeli men were arrested in connection with a massive human organ trafficking operation. It involved the removal of organs from living ethnic Serbs who were then left for dead in mass graves. There is no doubt that Ginsburgh’s statement provided the justification for this aberration.

Ginsburgh’s announcements where published in the largest New York Jewish Newspaper yet no attempts have been made to demand a retraction despite the explicit nature of political correctness. The overt nature of Jewish arrogance also features on the university campus with the Jewish ‘Professor’ Noel Ignatiev who quite blatantly teaches the annihilation of the White race. In the meantime the demographic of Europe and its territories is distorted by the influx of coloureds and hideous propaganda promoting miscegenation (race mixing). Coloured importation into White lands and only White lands is indefensible and those who try are race traitors. Immigration is White Genocide and this is the object of the Jewish occupation of Europe. Nevertheless, a Jewish media monopoly restricts, corrupts and manipulates a tidal wave of European tradition strangling the ethnic people with ‘false guilt’ and Jewish Marxist propaganda. It requires an independent mind to break through the dogma churned out via the Jewish mainstream. However, it is necessary to question information received from any source and formulate one’s own opinion instead of blindly accepting like cattle (goyim) to the slaughter.

Lessons from History

Posted on by
Reply

How Hitler defied the bankers

published by Abdul Alhazred on Fri, 2008-05-09 19:58

Many people take joy in saying Wall Street and Jewish bankers “financed Hitler.” There is plenty of documented evidence that Wall Street and Jewish bankers did indeed help finance Hitler at first, partly because it allowed the bankers to get rich (as I will describe below) and partly in order to control Stalin. However, when Germany broke free from the bankers, the bankers declared a world war against Germany.

When we look at all the facts, the charge that “Jews financed Hitler” becomes irrelevant. Los Angeles Attorney Ellen Brown discusses this topic in her book Web Of Debt…

When Hitler came to power, Germany was hopelessly broke. The Treaty of Versailles had imposed crushing reparations on the German people, demanding that Germans repay every nation’s costs of the war. These costs totaled three times the value of all the property in Germany.

Private currency speculators caused the German mark to plummet, precipitating one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times. A wheelbarrow full of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of bread. The national treasury was empty. Countless homes and farms were lost to speculators and to private (Jewish controlled) banks. Germans lived in hovels. They were starving.

Nothing like this had ever happened before – the total destruction of the national currency, plus the wiping out of people’s savings and businesses. On top of this came a global depression. Germany had no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international (mainly Jewish) bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came to power. At that point the German government thwarted the international banking cartels by issuing its own money. World Jewry responded by declaring a global boycott against Germany.

Hitler began a national credit program by devising a plan of public works that included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities. All these were paid for with money that no longer came from the private international bankers.

The projected cost of these various programs was fixed at one billion units of the national currency. To pay for this, the German government (not the international bankers) issued bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates. In this way the National Socialists put millions of people to work, and paid them with Treasury Certificates.

Under the National Socialists, Germany’s money wasn’t backed by gold (which was owned by the international bankers). It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, “For every mark issued, we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done, or goods produced.” The government paid workers in Certificates. Workers spent those Certificates on other goods and services, thus creating more jobs for more people. In this way the German people climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the international bankers.

Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries (controlled by international bankers) were still out of work. Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest.

Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the international bankers’ denial of foreign credit to Germany, and despite the global boycott by Jewish-owned industries. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system that cut the bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits. (Venezuela does the same thing today when it trades oil for commodities, plus medical help, and so on. Hence the bankers are trying to squeeze Venezuela.)

Germany’s economic freedom was short-lived; but it left several monuments, including the famous Autobahn, the world’s first extensive superhighway.

Hjalmar Schacht, a Rothschild agent who was temporarily head of the German central bank, summed it up thus… An American banker had commented, “Dr. Schacht, you should come to America. We’ve lots of money and that’s real banking.” Schacht replied, “You should come to Berlin. We don’t have money. That’s real banking.”

(Schact, the Rothschild agent, actually supported the private international bankers against Germany, and was rewarded by having all charges against him dropped at the Nuremberg trials.)

This economic freedom made Hitler extremely popular with the German people. Germany was rescued from English economic theory, which says that all currency must be borrowed against the gold owned by a private and secretive banking cartel — such as the Federal Reserve, or the Central Bank of Europe — rather than issued by the government for the benefit of the people.

Canadian researcher Dr. Henry Makow (who is Jewish himself) says the main reason why the bankers arranged for a world war against Germany was that Hitler sidestepped the bankers by creating his own money, thereby freeing the German people. Worse, this freedom and prosperity threatened to spread to other nations. Hitler had to be stopped!

Makow quotes from the 1938 interrogation of C. G. Rakovsky, one of the founders of Soviet Bolsevism and a Trotsky intimate. Rakovsky was tried in show trials in the USSR under Stalin. According to Rakovsky, Hitler was at first funded by the international bankers, through the bankers’ agent Hjalmar Schacht. The bankers financed Hitler in order to control Stalin, who had usurped power from their agent Trotsky. Then Hitler became an even bigger threat than Stalin when Hitler started printing his own money.

(Stalin came to power in 1922, which was eleven years before Hitler came to power.)

Rakovsky said:

“Hitler took over the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones. He took over the machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the people. Can you possibly imagine what would have come if this had infected a number of other states?” (Henry Makow, “Hitler Did Not Want War,” http://www.savethemales.com March 21, 2004).

Economist Henry C K Liu writes of Germany’s remarkable transformation:

“The Nazis came to power in 1933 when the German economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.” (Henry C. K. Liu, “Nazism and the German Economic Miracle,” Asia Times (May 24, 2005).

In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry commented:

“Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.”

These facts do not appear in any textbooks today, since Jews own most publishing companies. What does appear is the disastrous runaway inflation suffered in 1923 by the Weimar Republic, which governed Germany from 1919 to 1933. Today’s textbooks use this inflation to twist truth into its opposite. They cite the radical devaluation of the German mark as an example of what goes wrong when governments print their own money, rather than borrow it from private cartels.

In reality, the Weimar financial crisis began with the impossible reparations payments imposed at the Treaty of Versailles. Hjalmar Schacht – the Rothschild agent who was currency commissioner for the Republic — opposed letting the German government print its own money…

“The Treaty of Versailles is a model of ingenious measures for the economic destruction of Germany. Germany could not find any way of holding its head above the water, other than by the inflationary expedient of printing bank notes.”

Schact echoes the textbook lie that Weimar inflation was caused when the German government printed its own money. However, in his 1967 book The Magic of Money, Schact let the cat out of the bag by revealing that it was the PRIVATELY-OWNED Reichsbank, not the German government, that was pumping new currency into the economy. Thus, the PRIVATE BANK caused the Weimar hyper-inflation.

Like the U.S. Federal Reserve, the Reichsbank was overseen by appointed government officials, but was operated for private gain. What drove the wartime inflation into hyperinflation was speculation by foreign investors, who sold the mark short, betting on its decreasing value. In the manipulative device known as the short sale, speculators borrow something they don’t own, sell it, and then “cover” by buying it back at the lower price.

Speculation in the German mark was made possible because the PRIVATELY OWNED Reichsbank (not yet under Nazi control) made massive amounts of currency available for borrowing. This currency, like U.S. currency today, was created with accounting entries on the bank’s books. Then the funny-money was lent at compound interest. When the Reichsbank could not keep up with the voracious demand for marks, other private banks were allowed to create marks out of nothing, and to lend them at interest. The result was runaway debt and inflation.

Thus, according to Schacht himself, the German government did not cause the Weimar hyperinflation. On the contrary, the government (under the National Socialists) got hyperinflation under control. The National Socialists put the Reichsbank under strict government regulation, and took prompt corrective measures to eliminate foreign speculation. One of those measures was to eliminate easy access to funny-money loans from private banks. Then Hitler got Germany back on its feet by having the public government issue Treasury Certificates.

Schacht , the Rotchschild agent, disapproved of this government fiat money, and wound up getting fired as head of the Reichsbank when he refused to issue it. Nonetheless, he acknowledged in his later memoirs that allowing the government to issue the money it needed did not produce the price inflation predicted by classical economic theory, which says that currency must be borrowed from private cartels.

What causes hyper-inflation is uncontrolled speculation. When speculation is coupled with debt (owed to private banking cartels) the result is disaster. On the other hand, when a government issues currency in carefully measured ways, it causes supply and demand to increase together, leaving prices unaffected. Hence there is no inflation, no debt, no unemployment, and no need for income taxes.

Naturally this terrifies the bankers, since it eliminates their powers. It also terrifies Jews, since their control of banking allows them to buy the media, the government, and everything else.

Therefore, to those who delight in saying “Jews financed Hitler,” I ask that they please look at all the facts.

Social Engineering Exposed

Posted on by
Reply

Gerald Warner: Impact of politically correct Britain

Published: 06 October 2013

17 comments

THE War of Comrade Miliband generated much sound and fury, but all the belligerents and observers ignored its most salient aspect – that this imagined inquest on a supposedly dead creed was being conducted in the context of a society now dominated by Marxism.

The Party Line is currently termed Political Correctness, but the outcome is the same: the reconfiguration of language to police thought and impose an ideology, the harassing of religion, the destruction of marriage and the family, and the coercive remodelling of culture to accommodate a fanatical aberration that defies human nature itself.

Political correctness is cultural Marxism. The term was coined by Anton Semyonovich Makarenko, Lenin’s education guru and favourite wordsmith (he also invented the phrase “dictatorship of the proletariat”). From the beginning, Marxists recognised there was a lot more involved in imposing totalitarian social control than nationalisation of the means of production, distribution and exchange. In Hungary in 1919, during the short-lived but murderous Communist dictatorship of Bela Kun, his deputy “commissar for culture”, Georg Lukacs, introduced a programme of “cultural terrorism” under which he imposed pornographic sex education on schoolchildren, promoting promiscuity, denouncing the family and encouraging pupils to mock their parents and religion. The question Lukacs posed was: “Who will save us from Western Civilisation?”

Four years later, Lukacs was one of the founders of the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt, from which emerged the obscenity known today as Frankfurt School Marxism, dedicated to the destruction of civilisation. Max Horkheimer, its sometime director, followed up Lukacs’ experiment by grafting Freudianism onto Marxism. In this he was followed by Herbert Marcuse, an admirer of the Marquis de Sade, who expressed his belief in “polymorphous perversity”. This was complemented by the cultural Marxism of Gramsci and other adherents such as Adorno. Whether or not the Frankfurt Marxists had become sceptical of the command economy as an economic instrument, their main target was “the culture”.

Hitler’s accession to power drove the Frankfurt School prophets to seek refuge in America, for whose current state of debilitation they are ultimately responsible. Their pretentious vapourings found favour in academic circles. Idiocies such as “deconstruction”, whereby the texts of great writers were shredded by literary pygmies and reinterpreted in the light of Marxist neuroses, and “critical theory” set about debauching the classical literary canon and vandalising knowledge. Under this impetus, academic campuses, for half a century, have remained the unreformed temples of anti-culture; university library shelves still groan beneath the weight of delusory Marxist tomes. In the US, college campuses have become, in the words of Robert Lind, “small ivy-covered North Koreas”.

By corrupting the educators, Frankfurt Marxism secured its ascendancy over the elites. Education, the media, publishing, politics – all the commanding heights have been occupied by the cultural Marxist forces of anti-civilisation. The targets are vestigial Christianity, traditional ­institutions, national identity, the family – seen as an intolerable rival to the ­intruder state – and relations between men and women. The instruments of subversion are mass immigration and multiculturalism, to abolish homogeneity and national identity; the imposition of politically correct language (foreseen by Orwell as “Newspeak”) to prevent the articulation of dissident ideas; hate laws (also predicted by Orwell as “thought crime”); feminism, designed to alienate women from traditional motherhood and family roles; and promotion of the homosexual agenda (because anti-family). The introduction of “aggravated” offences has ended equality under the law.

Initially espousing advocacy, the agenda has become blatantly coercive. Bans and prohibitions proliferate exponentially. Hideous neologisms such as “homo­phobia” or “Islamophobia” are intruded into public discussion (“discourse” in PC ­terminology) to distort debate; last week the ludicrous Bonnie Greer promoted a new absurdity: “gynophobia”. Their common adherence to cultural Marxism has made all three political parties complicit in a de facto one-party state: a Conservative prime minister has a minister for equalities. Tory politicians are routinely described as “socially liberal”; politics is about society – if they are socially liberal, they are liberal per se. Saul Alinsky, the Marxist activist, was the inspiration for David Cameron’s “Big Society”.

The PC Terror threatens the employment and career prospects – on occasion the liberty – of those who do not ­conform. Public opinion is brainwashed by such devices as the “availability cascade”, ­collective belief moulded via the availability in the public forum of PC views; the “reputational cascade”, threatening social disapproval of dissidents; or the “chilling effect” on contrary viewpoints – the old Trotskyite “dysphoria” of 1970s campuses redeployed. In the tradition of Lukacs and Marcuse, society is offered a Faustian bargain: release from personal responsibility and legitimisation of hedonism if the public will embrace libertinism in exchange for liberty. Unless this totalitarian menace is quickly overthrown, Britain will confront a Marxist lunar landscape beyond the grimmest nightmares conceived by Ralph Miliband. «

Twitter: @GeraldWarner1

Genocide Defined

Posted on by
Reply

The crime of genocide as laid out in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the crime of Genocide.
In general but in particular in article 2 section c we see how the mass immigration and forced assimilation in white countries and only white countries is an act of genocide.
The targeting of white populations for ethnic cleansing in their own cities as well as forced integration is undoubtedly designed to cause harm to the target group.Social engineering policy such as promotion of mixed race marriage and women’s liberation movements to reduce birth rates in only white countries has compounded the attack.

Somebody is guilty and justice must be done
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/UN-GENO.asp